[sldev] [META] Formal critique of new auth mechanism?

[Rob Lanphier]

Matthew, thanks for making a start here.  Is everyone cool with Matthew
acting as sort of a working group chair for this document?

One process that I think would work moving forward is for people to
either sign the document as is (on the bottom), or comment on the talk
page about what is either unclear or flat-out wrong that prevents you
from signing it as is.

Rob

On 9/29/07 11:40 AM, Matthew Dowd wrote:
>>> Why a talk page? Why not a normal one? 
>>> Having a talk page without a main page seems weird to me.
>>>       
>
> Good point.
>
> I've made a start of this at 
>
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Viewer_Authentication_Critique
>
> I've divided this into three sections which I think reflect the three objectives of the new system: Security, Flexibility and Persistence and within each put subsections of Pros, Cons and Alternatives.
>
> I've started fleshing this out from the discussion so far.
>
> Matthew
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Feel like a local wherever you go.
> http://www.backofmyhand.com_______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>   


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070929/cec4dfb8/signature.pgp