[sldev] 1.19.1 release source

[Soft]

If it's a very simple change that strictly tweaks existing code or
assets, we may use the change without follow-up. If it's a substantial
change, we follow up privately with a contributor agreement. This is
needed not only to cover us, but to cover others who use the code
under a GPL license. The GPL nightmare scenario sees a patch with
improperly licensed code being integrated and polluting every viewer.
This puts not just us, but Henri, Marine, Dale, Nicholaz, Robin, and
many others in harm's way.

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Felix Duesenburg <kfa at gmx.net> wrote:
> Soft wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Matthew Dowd <matthew.dowd at hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >  There was a suitable "slate" scheme for the Dazzle firstlook posted in
> the forums.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Could you provide a link on that, or encourage the poster to file it
> > as a JIRA patch to clear licensing concerns?
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
>  That reminds me to ask - sorry if I overlooked this was covered already -
> is it still needed to submit the source code contribution agreement before
> sending anything as explained on the wiki, or has this become obsolete with
> the remark there on the JIRA?
>
>  Thanks
>