[sldev] Re: ETA for 1.20 source and supporting archives on the wiki?

[Soft]

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Carsten Juttner <carjay at gmx.net> wrote:
> Robin Cornelius wrote:
>
> > The only thing i can think of for your problem is that your gcc and your
> > boost libraries don't match.
> >
> >
>
>  I built against the system boost libs, too and also only changed the
> libnames as Robin did and it gave me no trouble (on x86_64).
>
>  Could it be a bug in the linker triggered by static linking?

Possible. Poppy Linden spotted this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625

For now, I'll match up to the same compiler toolchain used to build
the released viewer, which is gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)
(yes, I know!) and ensure the open source build is good there. If it's
all good, the only version I'm going to worry about past that is gcc
4.1, which carries the fix to the above issue. I'd like us to be more
ready for whenever the hell we get off Debian Sarge, anyway.