[sldev] What is the point of firstlook and giving feedback to LL

[Teravus Ovares]

This seems a bit like a flame if you won't sign the contribution
agreement.   Why complain that they have not applied your patches if you
won't follow the project rules?

-Teravus


On 4/21/08, Henri Beauchamp <sldev at free.fr> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:34:26 -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
>
> > On 4/10/08 11:35 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:22:40 -0400, Felix Duesenburg wrote:
> > >
> > >> Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I already gave up submitting bug reports to the JIRA as this proved
> > >>> to be a total loss of time and energy.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> I vote that some people are not allowed posting there anyway without
> a
> > >> patch attached. Especially those that claim they're so good that by
> the
> > >> time they spent ranting they could have squashed a few bugs. How come
> we
> > >> have any open issues at all then.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Be happy: http://sldev.free.fr/
> > >
> > > I do not only criticize, I also contribute. All my patches were also
> > > submitted to the JIRA.... with little to no result.
> > >
> > ....but without a contribution agreement, so we can't accept the
> > changes  :-(
>
> I already replied to you on this point: my patches are released under
> the GPL. You do not need a contribution agreement to apply GPLed patches
> to GPL code.
>
> Regards,
>
> Henri.
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080421/9fbb1abf/attachment.htm