Contribution agreements (Re: [sldev] What is the point of
firstlook and giving feedback to LL)
Argent Stonecutter
secret.argent at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 20:22:37 PDT 2008
On 2008-04-22, at 12:02, Justin Ryan wrote:
> That is much better than the Plone Foundation, and I commend you for
> it, but I still think you're inviting trouble unless you can prove
> that these contributors have never worked on or studied GPL code that
> is not dual licensed under BSD, MIT, X11, or similar.
That's SCO's argument against Linux. Please tell me you don't
honestly believe that if SCO had been a bit smarter about their
contract with Novell they really WOULD have the rights to control the
distribution of Linux that they claimed.
More information about the SLDev
mailing list