[sldev] Viewer security vulnerability disclosure group
Rob Lanphier
robla at lindenlab.com
Mon Dec 29 18:39:52 PST 2008
On 12/29/08 4:31 AM, Alissa Sabre wrote:
>> Great discussion!
>>
>
> This issue continued more than five messages. This issue seems non
> technical. Why didn't you stop the dicussion?
>
> Well, I believe this issue is important for many of SLDev subscribers
> and is worth discussing on the list, so I have no objection to see the
> discussion continues. However, Rob, you *are* the guardian of the
> list, and you should not ignore your rule.
>
>
You're right. Here's the JIRA issue:
http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-11305
I'll respond to some of the points you raised in this thread there.
Additionally, I've made a proposal to rework the guideline here:
https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Talk:SLDev#Per_person.2Fthread_limit_on_conversation.3F
I might be biased because this is an issue that I raised and thus was
more interested in it, but I think the conversation on this issue didn't
set off red flags for me in the same way that past conversations have
because most folks were both civil and didn't try to hog the microphone,
so to speak.
Rob
More information about the SLDev
mailing list