[sldev] Re: CMake preview available - please try it out!

[Dale Glass]

On Monday 04 February 2008 10:02:56 Robin Cornelius wrote:
> I would guess xmlrpc-epi.so as there are many other xmlrpc libraries
> available and it minimisies collision chances with another installed
> library and it is obvious which xmlrpc library you are looking at.
>
> Also this is what the default ./configure make make install scripts
> generate.
Actually no, the xmlrpc-epi-0.51 package I have generates a 
libxmlrpc.so.0.0.3

> It is usual on distro based systems to have a lib and a develo
> pacakge. The lib contains xmlrpc-epi.so.0 which has the so name
> appended and the develo package contains the headers AND a
> xmlrpc-epi.so symlink. Applications would build against xmlrpc-epi.so
> then due to the symlink the binary becomes dependent on
> xmlrpc-epi.so.0.
The actual name generated is libxmlrpc-epi.so.0.0.3. ldconfig then symlinks 
that to libxmlrpc-epi.so.0. But CMake is looking libxmlrpc-epi.so.

So how do I either convince ldconfig to make a libxmlrpc-epi.so, or CMake 
to use the .0?

>
> Regards
>
> Robin


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20080204/99153300/attachment.pgp