[sldev] SLVoice / Vivox Replacement

[Tateru Nino]

Soft wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 5:36 PM, Tateru Nino <tateru.nino at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Was there not also an issue with the documentation licensing? Or was
>> that resolved? I don't quite recall.
>>     
>
> The vendor had a restrictive clause controlling who could look at the
> voice documentation. We insisted that be removed as soon as sldevers
> pointed it out.
>
>   
Ah, glad to hear. I might take another look at that documentation now.

-- 
Tateru Nino
http://www.massively.com/