[sldev] SLVoice / Vivox Replacement
Tateru Nino
tateru.nino at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 23:35:27 PST 2008
Soft wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 5:36 PM, Tateru Nino <tateru.nino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Was there not also an issue with the documentation licensing? Or was
>> that resolved? I don't quite recall.
>>
>
> The vendor had a restrictive clause controlling who could look at the
> voice documentation. We insisted that be removed as soon as sldevers
> pointed it out.
>
>
Ah, glad to hear. I might take another look at that documentation now.
--
Tateru Nino
http://www.massively.com/
More information about the SLDev
mailing list