[sldev] Qt for the viewer

Soft soft at lindenlab.com
Tue Jul 15 14:02:25 PDT 2008


If anyone spends time evaluating or experimenting with either, be sure
to look into i18n support. I believe it was Alissa, contributor of
more than a dozen Asian language support viewer patches, who said that
Asian language support was problematic under Qt.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:54 PM, JB Kraft <kwerks.sl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Qt is ok, but personally I find WxWidgets much easier to deal with. MOC is a
> strange creature. That said, I rather like the current ui tools. If as much
> time were put into a good refactoring and decoupling, making the current ui
> tools into an independant library as it would take to port to Qt or Wx, I
> think that would be a very useful toolkit for cross-plat GL work. Perhaps
> that's generous though ;)
>
> regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jordi Polo <mumismo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I want to point to this article:
>>
>> http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2008/06/27/accelerate-your-widgets-with-opengl/
>>
>>
>> I personally love Qt and I am sure that all the on-screen widgets and
>> menues would be far easier to program using it. Along with integrated XML
>> library, webkit (dont know how this mix with the webkit on opengl project),
>> styles, phonon and other goodies.
>> But I guess that would be too big of a change.
>>
>> --
>> Jordi Polo Carres
>> NLP laboratory - NAIST
>> http://www.bahasara.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>> privileges
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
> privileges
>


More information about the SLDev mailing list