[sldev] GPL violation?

[Soft]

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Argent Stonecutter
<secret.argent at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2008-06-01, at 09:17, Cenji Neutra wrote:
>>
>> Not sure which aspect you're referring to when you say "clear this is not
>> allowed" Dante, but I know that the GPL certainly allows the sale of
>> derivative works (binary and/or source).
>
> But it doesn't allow you to add additional restrictions to the license.
> Their restriction to a single avatar is clearly in violation.

We definitely haven't granted a closed license to a naked avatar
viewer if that's the question here.

If anyone who has a patch in the viewer has already contacted the
person offering this viewer, please consider forwarding any response
you receive to our legal eagles. You have just as much standing to
engage them about any GPL violation as we have, and may have the
freedom to move more quickly here. But please do start with an attempt
to educate, as they may not realize it if they really are violating
the only license that would allow them to redistribute our/your work.
The goal should be correcting the situation, not piling on.