[sldev] Cache politics: performance vs obfuscation

Tateru Nino tateru.nino at gmail.com
Wed Jun 11 21:27:05 PDT 2008


Every encoded asset would have to be recoded. You'd also need to then 
mark which assets had been recoded and which had not. "On the fly" in 
this case would mean "Stop and rewrite hundreds of megabytes of data 
before continuing"

SignpostMarv Martin wrote:
> Why not get the key via caps ? Then the key can be changed on the fly,
> perhaps even during the same session.
>
> ~ Marv.
>
> Dante Tucker wrote:
>> The only problem with changing the key every release is a lot of 
>> people don't use the latest version. Then theres people like myself 
>> that use there own custom build.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Thordain Curtis 
>> <thordain at thordain.com <mailto:thordain at thordain.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Argent wins the thread. Most are either completely downplaying
>>         any sort of deterrent to theft and actually encouraging it,
>>         while the other side is proposing ridiculously complex
>>         encryption specifications which would severely harm the
>>         ability of SL to function.
>>
>>         Argent's proposal is balanced enough to make everyone happy.
>>         Sure, anyone with can get past a "Hello World" program will be
>>         able to break it. But the point is, 90% of SL users can't get
>>         that far. So as a deterrent, it will prevent casual
>>         misappropriation of restricted materials.  On the other end,
>>         it won't severely hamper anyone from doing whatever 'ubercool'
>>         stuff they want to do.
>>
>>
>>     Agreed.  Using a slightly obfuscated raw texture format for cache
>>     will prevent the usage of the cache files in any image editor (as
>>     written to disk), and should speed up decoding in the client.  As
>>     an additional measure, LL could consider changing the XOR key with
>>     every major release and clearing the cache (many versions do
>>     anyways).  At least this would force all the pirates to
>>     re-download their "decoder software" every month or so.
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>   

-- 
Tateru Nino
http://www.massively.com/



More information about the SLDev mailing list