Contribution agreements (Re: [sldev] What is the point offirstlook and giving feedback to LL)

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 2008-05-08, at 06:10, Gordon Wendt wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned LL already has betrayed the trust of their  
> contributors the moment they decided to downline license rights to  
> the viewer essentially making that version that they licensed out  
> closed source even though it was based off open source  
> contributions and as of yet nothing has been gotten back by the  
> contributors by LL's selling out.

How do you feel about Trolltech's dual license?

What if LL did what Trolltech has done, and agree to BSDL (or  
equivalent) the SL viewer if they quit supporting it?