[sldev] AppendedAcks

Ryan Williams (Which) rdw at lindenlab.com
Fri Apr 3 00:41:44 PDT 2009


On 4/3/09 12:30 AM, Ambrosia wrote:
>> There's been much discussion on the MMOX mailing list about LLSD vs google
>> protocol buffers.
>>
>> I'm not sure that the rejection was concerning that particular form of
>> serialization or merely concerns
>> about insisting that we use that particular way of describing the
>> on-the-wire protocol.
>>      
>
> Sounds to me like a 'We're not sure if we want to use this, or if
> there is something better. We can't quite tell why, so better not
> change it.' thing ;P
>
> Seriously, compared to current LLSD I don't see a single disadvantage
> in the protocol buffers. It's less static, smaller, more flexible. All
> in all..more modern.
>
>    
I think you're confusing LLSD[1] with the Binary UDP Message System[2].  
Different things for different use cases.

[1] http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/LLSD
[2] https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Protocol#Binary_UDP


More information about the SLDev mailing list