[sldev] Unexpected objects return in group land

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 2009-07-08, at 19:49, Opensource Obscure wrote:
> User 1 tries rezzing an object made of N+X prims.
> The object doesn't get prevented to rez (as I think it
> should): it gets rezzed, while other X prims are returned
> to their owner, who is not user 1, with a "because
> the parcel is full" message.

Oh, sorry, this is a different problem than I thought.

Yes, when you rez an object and there aren't enough prims it should  
simply not rez.

There have been several different variations of this one over the  
years, all bad. The correct solution (don't rez the object, leave it  
in inventory) seems too obvious.