[sldev] Direction for Snowglobe 1.3

[Moriz Gupte]

I have a question, has then been any progress on the single port
solution for Snowglobe? I think LL put out a call for contractors a
while back to deal with the socket programming etc.. This is a make or
break deal for feds who want to use Snowglobe behind their firewall.
Ramesh

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Moriz Gupte <moriz.gupte at gmail.com> wrote:
> If that's possible, I support Mike's propositions in the same order.
> R
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Mike Monkowski
> <monkowsk at fishkill.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Continuing the discussion from the last Open Source meeting:
>>
>>> # [15:04] Merov Linden: well, I got a bunch of action items from this meeting and directions for 1.3
>>> # [15:04] Mojito Sorbet: Merov, that works only provided that where you want to end up is in the same direction.
>>> # [15:04] Merov Linden: we should continue the discussion on sldev
>>
>> My suggestions (not necessarily in order by priority) are:
>>
>> 1.  Merge the puppeteering branch in as a first step toward creating
>> animations in-world.
>> 2.  Support for MS Visual Studio 2008 and 2010 beta.  Yep, two versions
>> behind, time to migrate.
>> 3.  Support for 64 bit.
>>
>> Mike
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rameshsharma Ramloll PhD Research Assistant Professor Idaho State
> University, PocatelloTel: 208-282-5333
> More info at http://tr.im/RRamloll
> 'Consider how the lilies grow. They do not labor or spin.'
>



-- 
Rameshsharma Ramloll PhD Research Assistant Professor Idaho State
University, PocatelloTel: 208-282-5333
More info at http://tr.im/RRamloll
'Consider how the lilies grow. They do not labor or spin.'