[sldev] 3rd party viewer policy post on blogs.secondlife.com
Thomas Grimshaw
tom at streamsense.net
Tue Oct 20 17:13:23 PDT 2009
That should have read "violate the license", not ToS.
~T
Thomas Grimshaw wrote:
> This is all pretty ridiculous.
>
> The viewer code is open source. Third party viewer developers MUST make
> the source available so as not to violate the ToS. This means that ANY
> third party viewer code might be changed at some point to add something
> malicious, there is absolutely no way of detecting, preventing or
> avoiding this. All this policy will do is drive the current "bad"
> viewers to spoof and hide their identity.
>
> I'm pretty sure the Lindens know this, and so i'm taking this
> announcement with a pinch of salt... it serves as a warning to
> residents, and it really doesn't affect viewer developers.
>
> Tom.
>
> Gordon Wendt wrote:
>
>> If LL just keeps this as a way to note which viewers are sanctioned as
>> reliable 3rd party viewers it will be great, it wll all but elminate
>> scamming people into downloading fake versions of any well known 3rd
>> party viewers and will give the developers a mark of trust.
>>
>> It worries me that extremists like Ann and Prok want this to be
>> something it's not, a mandatory full code cavity search to connect to
>> SL if you will, but the Lindens already ignore Prok most of the time
>> and hopefully they'll ignore the other extremists who essentially want
>> to close source SL again and/or make it so 3rd party viewers have to
>> be licensed to enter but cannot distribute their code any further
>> (currently a violation of the GPL so it would require a license
>> change) to prevent people using it maliciously.
>>
>> -Gordon
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Stickman <stickman at gmail.com
>> <mailto:stickman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> > This is likely to have a negative impact on interest in
>> supporting the
>> > viewer at dev level. There is little point in working on
>> something that you
>> > cannot use and test because access is denied.
>> >
>> > It's equivalent to a website allowing only specific builds of
>> web browser to
>> > connect. With this move, you will drop right off the main open
>> source
>> > highway and into a backwater.
>>
>> There's been a lot of discussion on this issue, about what should be
>> done and what makes sense, and what's uncontrollable.
>>
>> From what I read, LL's making a very smart move here.
>>
>> 1) They're going to be officially listing the legit third party
>> viewers.
>> 2) They're going to ban those residents who create harmful viewers
>> that break the ToS.
>>
>> I mean, where's the problem? Did I read something wrong?
>>
>> -Stickman
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated
>> posting privileges
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
More information about the SLDev
mailing list