[sldev] 3rd party viewer policy post on blogs.secondlife.com

[Tigro Spottystripes]

what I was thinking was that the viewer binary would somehow be signed
in a way that it could be verified as having been generated by someone
that has been given a trust key from LL, the exactly how part went down
the drain kinda

Mike Dickson escreveu:
> How does that help validate a viewer is "certified"?  I can see a OTP to
> validate a user. The point with the GSM example is the source info is
> "tamper proof."  I don't see that here with a viewer, especially an open
> source one where source needs to be distributed.
>
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:59 +0000, Anders Arnholm wrote: 
>   
>> No the screat are probalt some muchg lnger than allen, it will be
>> trasforemed with an algoritm.
>>
>>     f(SKEY, Challange) 
>>
>> Is what are going to be sent,  this to make sure that KEY are not sent
>> over the net and intercepter by anyone on the internet. The problem some
>> to the viewer have to be able to make the calculation f(SKEY, Challange)
>> to make this computation the coputer will need to have both the function
>> f(k,c) and the SKEY someware. Whan you have both these to pices of
>> information in one computer figuring out f() and SKEY are a trivial
>> work.
>>     
>
>
>
>