[opensource-dev] Soft body physics
moriz.gupte at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 08:14:17 PDT 2010
I feel you are right. Makes more sense to have it implemented client side
for many soft body dynamic behaviors... eg cloth, hair etc...
but I think in areas where rigid body behaviors impact local soft body
dynamics, there will be lots of timing and synch problems to deal with.
So there's where I think that perhaps all physics need to be done at the
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Glen Canaday <gcanaday at gmail.com> wrote:
> Soft body physics are best implemented in a local viewer, leaving the
> rigid-body collision detection to the server, am I right in this?
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
'Consider how the lilies grow. They do not labor or spin.'
Rameshsharma Ramloll PhD Research Assistant Professor Idaho State
University, PocatelloTel: 208-282-5333
More info at http://tr.im/RRamloll
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the opensource-dev