[opensource-dev] Brown-bag meeting to continue dialog on TVPV next Tuesday (4/13)

Carlo Wood carlo at alinoe.com
Fri Apr 9 04:43:42 PDT 2010


On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:28:14AM -0400, Robert Martin wrote:
> >> Voice is a no-no for me. Being French, I can't speak and understand
> >> spoken English (and worst, American English...) well and fast enough
> >> to hold a conversation in voice.
> >
> also unless im not mistaken holding it in Voice also guarantees that
> there will not be a transcript of what was said. Unless there is now a
> rock solid low lag real time way of transcribing the voice parts since
> we are going to be discussing legal matters it needs to be recordable.

That is probably exactly the reason why they want it to be in voice:
so that there is no transcript and nobody can use whatever is going
to be said in court at a later time.

It is meant to be "informational" only, which is probably not very
useful indeed, unless the information flows both ways and this will
lead to a change of the TPV policy.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe.com>


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list