[opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVP Topics to a different mailing list

Rob Nelson nexisentertainment at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 10:23:22 PDT 2010


I decided to read the transcript and it did not address any of my
concerns.  

[12:21][Voice Transcript] Joe Linden: we've ha a lot of internal debate
around cost/benefit of OS

^ That was all I needed to hear.  Debate's effectively over.

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 09:27 -0700, Joe Linden wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> I take it you weren't at the meeting yesterday?
> 
> -- Joe
> 
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Rob Nelson
> <nexisentertainment at gmail.com> wrote:
>         It's already reached a point where LL has told us, to our
>         faces, that
>         they are not going to change the policy, meaning our opinion
>         doesn't
>         mean diddly to them.  There's no use continuing to discussion,
>         just as
>         there's no use continuing TPV development.
>         
>         
>         
>         On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 07:52 -0500, Jonathan Irvin wrote:
>         > To Whom It May Concern:
>         >
>         > I'm requesting Linden Lab's response to this inquiry due to
>         the recent
>         > influx of new topic related...or should I say unrelated to
>         the
>         > development of the SnowGlobe viewer.  Lately, when I open my
>         email, I
>         > get 5-10 different topics and responses daily to the recent
>         changes
>         > for the Third Party Viewer policy and I feel that this is
>         not related
>         > to SnowGlobe or related development at all.
>         >
>         > To "clear the pipes", can we please move these discussions
>         to a
>         > different forum or list so valid OpenSource development
>         questions are
>         > not lost in the flames, complaints, and discussions related
>         to this
>         > specific topic?
>         >
>         > I do not feel it is valid in this forum to talk about which
>         > Third-Party Viewers in the directory were already
>         impersonated or
>         > which part of the third party viewer policy they do not
>         like.
>         >
>         > Linden Labs, if you can please isolate this to another
>         forum, I bet
>         > those who are truly interested in the opensource development
>         of the
>         > Second Life viewer would be more in tuned to staying here
>         rather than
>         > wake up to read yet another unproductive "I hate LL and the
>         TPVP lets
>         > get together and share our misery post".
>         >
>         > Respectfully & Best Regards,
>         >
>         > Jonathan Irvin
>         > SL Resident of 5 Years.
>         
>         
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>         > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>         > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated
>         posting privileges
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>         http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>         Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated
>         posting privileges
>         
> 




More information about the opensource-dev mailing list