[opensource-dev] Snowstorm, JIRA and versions
Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
oz at lindenlab.com
Tue Aug 17 18:45:14 PDT 2010
On 2010-08-17 20:00, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at my backlog of SNOW bugs and I'm really missing right
> now a "Snowstorm x.x" version in the "Fixed revision(s)" field.
> Especially after this afternoon meeting where everyone agreed to work
> off Snowstorm only and let SG2.x dies. For instance, there a JIRA
> issue (http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SNOW-646) that we discussed
> with WolfPup on IRC that would be great to add to the Snowstorm backlog.
>
> Anyway, it's easy enough to add but we need to agree on what to add
> and a couple of other things:
> * SNOW product: I think I read somewhere that we will be using VWR and
> not SNOW for Snowstorm bugs. Correct? (I'm fine with it... just asking
> for clarification...). If correct, I'll start moving JIRAs from SNOW
> to VWR when I see fit.
That's correct.
> * Affect versions: either way, how do we identify versions now? For
> instance, issues in the current lindenlab/viewer-development repo
> should be marked as what? I suppose "Viewer 2.1.1"...
good question... Esbee is owns version numbering, I suspect we should
change to either 2.1.2 or 2.2.0 but let's let her weigh in.
> * Fixed versions: this is trickier, as we're moving with a bi monthly
> release schedule, we're going to increment that number quite fast.
> Again, fine with me but we need to create "Viewer 2.1.2" and a couple
> of others as well as a "Viewer 2.x" to park issues that are not on the
> backlog at all.
Well, if I'm not mistaken, viewers built from the viewer-development
branch will also have the _DEVELOPMENT at the end of the version string
- do we really need to increment any of the first three until they go to
Beta and Release?
More information about the opensource-dev
mailing list