[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

[Andrew Simpson]

  oh.. what this mean? we cant use emerald anymore?


On 22/08/2010 2:01 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Am Sunday 22 August 2010 schrieb L. Christopher Bird:
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Barnett<jessesa at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Ignoring this and giving the all clear with no other action taken
>>> on the part of Linden Lab will instead demonstrate that the TPV
>>> is a worthless scrap of paper.
>> Correction, it only exist on paper if printed. The proper phrase is
>> "a worthless configuration of pixels"
>>
>> The TPVP makes it clear what the consequences are for breaking the
>> policy. 8c says:
>>
>> "If a Third-Party Viewer or your use or distribution of it violates
>> this Policy or any Linden Lab policy, your permission to access
>> Second Life using the Third-Party Viewer shall terminate
>> automatically. You acknowledge and agree that we may require you
>> to stop using or distributing a Third-Party Viewer for accessing
>> Second Life if we determine that there is a violation."
>>
>> So either the lab will enforce this, or they will say "Well you are
>> so popular you can screw around all you want".  Is Emerald the
>> viewer "too big to fail"?
>>
>> -- ZenMondo
> I just looked and emerald's not in the tpv directory anymore.
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>


-- 
AnSky Grid is fun & enjoy with community <AnSky Grid <http://www.ansky.ca>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20100822/2f6f00f2/attachment.htm