[opensource-dev] DRM vs TOS Was: Third party viewer policy
Dzonatas Sol
dzonatas at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 06:46:03 PST 2010
Lawson English wrote:
> For a real life use case, the realxtend developers are currently
> debating whether or not it is worth their while to continue to add more
> support to SL rather than just go with OpenSim-only.
>
>
If any viewer is under GPL terms, rather it is derived or not, it
probably won't comply with the TOS if the TOS mandates DRM.
Software that runs on hardware that enforces DRM is not different than
software that connects to a service that enforces DRM.
Obviously, basic login credentials aren't being seen as DRM, yet MAC
address, channels, and other means to enforce control of the client
software, especially through TOS policy, is DRM.
All those discussion's we've had on this list about "signed-off" scripts
and programs, even encrypted, have had their rug pulled. Even
Microsoft's one-click programs are affected.
I wouldn't say LL backpedaled on the GPL, yet I will say the DRM
movement is highly questionable. I can understand why realxtend would
want to not continue support for SL with such cloud of questions. This
would have been prevented if... you know, there is a big elephant in
the room.
More information about the opensource-dev
mailing list