[opensource-dev] Fwd: FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy

Tigro Spottystripes tigrospottystripes at gmail.com
Sun Feb 28 20:06:40 PST 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

but scripts are oblivious to that data, no?

On 1/3/2010 01:05, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) <maggie at matrisync.com>
> Date: Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy
> To: Tigro Spottystripes <TigroSpottystripes at gmail.com>
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Tigro Spottystripes
> <tigrospottystripes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> An user agent string for the client would indeed be useful, but would be
>> useless to catch all but the lamest malicious clients.
> 
> Well, I though that's what the required "unique channel" is for.
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuLPU4ACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmXaOQCgigHiCnfoOEJdmFA3irHh9Qna
yJIAn293Sxriwby4ReCxiov5QqKX+xqp
=AF/a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list