[opensource-dev] Fwd: FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy
morgaine.dinova at googlemail.com
Sun Feb 28 20:13:21 PST 2010
Back in the old days of Philip's SL, Lindens often proclaimed the futility
of entering an arms race, and the channel concept stems from that ---
self-identification as a choice, in the knowledge that stronger measures
will always be countered anyway. It seems that those days are long gone
Anyone wanting a solid business for the next few years might consider
selling brooms to SL protectionists. There's a lot of tide to sweep back.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) <
maggie at matrisync.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) <maggie at matrisync.com>
> Date: Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy
> To: Tigro Spottystripes <TigroSpottystripes at gmail.com>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Tigro Spottystripes
> <tigrospottystripes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > An user agent string for the client would indeed be useful, but would be
> > useless to catch all but the lamest malicious clients.
> Well, I though that's what the required "unique channel" is for.
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the opensource-dev