[opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0^H^H^H1.3 way forward?

[Argent Stonecutter]

On 2010-03-12, at 07:45, Aleric Inglewood wrote:
> I'm even disappointed by the sheep that instantly started to reappy
> all ignored 1.x patches and are working their ass off to get 2.0 to
> compile and run... What is the use? Are you going to use it yourself?

So you think the way forward to Snowglobe should be to ignore 2.x and  
see about backporting the 2.x functional improvements to 1.3.x?

What would Linden Lab do if people actually started doing that?