[opensource-dev] Snowglobe 2.0^H^H^H1.3 way forward?

[Celierra Darling]

I think this "no" refers to the ".0" iteration.  If 2.x stays around for as
long as 1.x, mesh might end up in some 2.x (but obviously not 2.0).

Celi


On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Armin Weatherwax <
armin.weatherwax at googlemail.com> wrote:

>
> e.g. that:
>
> SLDev Mailing List <sldev at lists.secondlife.com> "Kent Quirk (Q Linden)"
> <q at lindenlab.com> wrote On Jan 14, 2010, at 06:55:
>
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 11:42 PM, Dale Mahalko wrote:
>
> > There are other important questions to ask about SL 2.0.
> >
> > Will the mesh implementation... <SNIP>
>
> NO.
>
> I don't know how the mesh rumor got started, but it's already been
> stated in this thread that 2.0 will NOT include mesh support. All the
> questions are interesting, but they don't apply yet.
>
>        Q
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20100313/241fcc2c/attachment.htm