[opensource-dev] Open Development project: extendingavatarwearables

[Carlo Wood]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> >Assume that the project will result in jackets
> >(the canonical example) can be tucked in and/or being
> >worn under shirts. Would you really still need it to
> >be converted to a shirt?
> 
> If the project was going to achieve that goal, then they wouldn't
> really *be* jackets vs shirts vs undershirts any more, they'd just
> be  "tops". But that's not what Nyx has proposed.

That is not really true. The big difference between jackets
and shirts is that jackets have a texture on the lower part
too. Also, the default insertion point when wearing a new
item would still be different.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe.com>