[opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY" for SL TPV developers

[Tayra Dagostino]

Developers reply to LL if their code is malicious, not if a user mod  
the viewer code and violate tos/cs....

11/12 mean developer don't write intentionally bad code...

-- 
Sent by iPhone

Il giorno 30/mar/2010, alle ore 15.13, Marine Kelley <marinekelley at gmail.com 
 > ha scritto:

> Naturally but do they apply to the developer ? They should void only
> for the original dev who implemented the feature intentionally, if
> any. Keeping in mind that the servers are as responsible to protect
> the data add the viewers are responsible to not attack them. To me
> developers (paid by LL as well as open source therefore unpaid) should
> be innocent until proven guilty. That's the only way to keep a sane
> relationship.
>
>
> On 30 mars 2010, at 14:52, Simon Disk <simon.disk29 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think I have read a different TPV policy than most people here. I
>> do not see how clauses 11 and 12 are being overridden. Both clauses
>> stipulate that the GPL cannot be used to violate the law. So when
>> you use a TPV and connect to the SL grid and then steal content that
>> you did not create or disrupt Linden Lab's service, those clauses no
>> longer apply to you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>> privileges
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting  
> privileges
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20100330/ff193d7a/attachment.htm