[opensource-dev] Sprint 7 - retrospective
Anya Kanevsky
akanevsky at productengine.com
Mon Nov 15 15:03:10 PST 2010
*Sprint 7 retrospective:*
*
*
*Merov:*
*Good:*
* Time track work better though we still need to do a better job
* Got traction on "big" items, not just bug fixes
*Needs Improvement:*
* We're doing a good job with small things but not that good with bigger
ones. My own experience shows that 2 weeks is to short to
design/socialize/review/code/iterate on anything.
* Time and work load not used consistently, so the burn rate and dashboard
cannot be trusted. Please update the work spent and remaining time!
* We still need a way to pick patches from community faster
*Oz:*
*Good:*
* group communication worked extremely well
* made lots of progress communicating with community
* handled several integration & beta release minor crises and not have it
disrupt everything we’re doing
*Needs Improvement:*
* trouble focusing on coding tasks
* time is too fragmented
* need a way to take quick & easy patches - use RB & has proposal for fast
path
*Esbee:*
Esbee had nothing good to say.
*Needs Improvement:*
* Need to stagger design and development across sprints. (IE. Prim
alignment, Keyboard Shortcuts, etc.)
* On a case by case basis, I think we need to consider creating project
branches for stories we pick up so we don't have non-functional code sitting
in viewer-development.
We can determine this during sprint planning by marking tickets for which we
want to create a project viewer.
*Anya:*
* beginning of sprint - not enough work - end of sprint - not enough time
*Resident Feedback:*
*Boroondas Gupte: *Where communication went a bit wrong (I'm partly to blame
about that myself, I guess) is VWR-23826 . WolfPup asked me to test the
STORM-102 branch, where I noticed that. I've asked Oz what info would be
needed from me to fix this before it hits viewer-dev, but I still don't know
what I have to provide.
* this issue is not lost and will be included in the next sprint.
*Improvement & action plan:*
3-week sprint:
* doing things in the open takes more time
* Sprint 8 will be a 3-week sprint. At the end we will review and consider
whether to keep this going forward.
* still need to stagger design & socialization work so we have enough at the
beginning of a sprint
Update dashboard daily so we can use results:
* give ourselves credit for what we do, and give ourselves data for better
analysis.
* grumpity to follow up personal tracking in jira
* add merge monkey task in jira and assign back & forth during sprint
* beta build task
* best practices sharing.
* oz to propose a proposal for quick updates
Project viewer for larger changes:
* named branch in a forked repo? Fork?
* project viewer before merging back into viewer-dev
** code review
** product owner review
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20101115/4cd7ac72/attachment.htm
More information about the opensource-dev
mailing list