[opensource-dev] Sprint 7 - retrospective

Anya Kanevsky akanevsky at productengine.com
Mon Nov 15 15:03:10 PST 2010


*Sprint 7 retrospective:*

*
*

*Merov:*

*Good:*

 * Time track work better though we still need to do a better job

* Got traction on "big" items, not just bug fixes

*Needs Improvement:*

 * We're doing a good job with small things but not that good with bigger
ones. My own experience shows that 2 weeks is to short to
design/socialize/review/code/iterate on anything.

* Time and work load not used consistently, so the burn rate and dashboard
cannot be trusted. Please update the work spent and remaining time!

* We still need a way to pick patches from community faster


*Oz:*

*Good:*

* group communication worked extremely well

* made lots of progress communicating with community

* handled several integration & beta release minor crises and not have it
disrupt everything we’re doing

*Needs Improvement:*

* trouble focusing on coding tasks

* time is too fragmented

* need a way to take quick & easy patches - use RB & has proposal for fast
path


*Esbee:*

Esbee had nothing good to say.

*Needs Improvement:*

* Need to stagger design and development across sprints. (IE. Prim
alignment, Keyboard Shortcuts, etc.)

* On a case by case basis, I think we need to consider creating project
branches for stories we pick up so we don't have non-functional code sitting
in viewer-development.

We can determine this during sprint planning by marking tickets for which we
want to create a project viewer.


*Anya:*

* beginning of sprint - not enough work - end of sprint - not enough time


*Resident Feedback:*

*Boroondas Gupte: *Where communication went a bit wrong (I'm partly to blame
about that myself, I guess) is VWR-23826 . WolfPup asked me to test the
STORM-102 branch, where I noticed that.  I've asked Oz what info would be
needed from me to fix this before it hits viewer-dev, but I still don't know
what I have to provide.

* this issue is not lost and will be included in the next sprint.


*Improvement & action plan:*

3-week sprint:

* doing things in the open takes more time

* Sprint 8 will be a 3-week sprint. At the end we will review and consider
whether to keep this going forward.

* still need to stagger design & socialization work so we have enough at the
beginning of a sprint


Update dashboard daily so we can use results:

* give ourselves credit for what we do, and give ourselves data for better
analysis.

* grumpity to follow up personal tracking in jira

* add merge monkey task in jira and assign back & forth during sprint

* beta build task

* best practices sharing.

* oz to propose a proposal for quick updates


Project viewer for larger changes:

* named branch in a forked repo? Fork?

* project viewer before merging back into viewer-dev

** code review

** product owner review
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20101115/4cd7ac72/attachment.htm 


More information about the opensource-dev mailing list