[opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-829 Viewer 2 does not parse /me in object Instant Messages
Aleric Inglewood
Aleric.Inglewood at gmail.com
Thu Jan 6 07:00:28 PST 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/#review120
-----------------------------------------------------------
What about /Me, /ME or /me followed by another punctuation? Ie, "/me?", "/me!", etc...
Just asking because these comparisions with just "/me " and "/me'" seem very limited,
almost weird. More logical would be to not check anything at ALL - and either expand
things, or not. What happens if you just set a flag saying "whatever is in this
string, don't expand /me, /who, /whois, /kick etc" without at that point checking
for one specific case (missing possibly many other variations).
- Aleric
On Jan. 5, 2011, 6:14 p.m., Jonathan Yap wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 5, 2011, 6:14 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Viewer.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> The "/me" in the lsl code below would be displayed rather than being translated to a name:
> llInstantMessage(llGetOwner(),"/me Hello, Avatar!");
>
>
> This addresses bug STORM-829.
> http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/STORM-829
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> indra/newview/llviewermessage.cpp 845cab866155
>
> Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/attachments/20110106/bc520272/attachment.htm
More information about the opensource-dev
mailing list