[sldev] Results from Friday bug triage - next one planned for Monday, 3pm

[Jesse Nesbitt]

Since I was gone for most of the triage, are we triaging feature requests
such as MISC-40, which is missfiled?

On 4/14/07, Rob Lanphier <robla at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The bug triage went very well, I think.  That's not to say that the
> process was perfect or anything, but I think it was a good learning
> experience.
>
> I placed a list of issues we discussed here:
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Bug_triage/2007-04-13
>
> We either agreed to resolved them (usually "Cannot Reproduce", meaning
> that a more useful repro case was needed), or importing them into LL's
> internal bug database.  Only one remained open for discussion:
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-179
> "Cannot edit modifiable items within unmodifiable object"
>
> We get about 50 new bugs/week, which means that we'd need to hold one of
> these about 5 times a week to keep up if we continue to do it this way.
> I asked the people that were there if it was a good use of their time,
> and the feeling seemed to be mixed (with no one saying "omg...this was
> the best 90 minutes of my LIFE", oddly enough).
>
> Suggestions discussed:
> *  Google speadsheet or wiki page with list of bugs to consider.  My
> vote (probably predictably) is a wiki page.
> *  Gigs suggested we set up a mailing list especially for dispatching
> bugs (slqa?)  Since there would be at least something of a scope
> boundary between sldev and slqa, it's not something I'd object to,
> though I'd like to see strong support for the idea of a separate list
> before creating one.
>
> Here's what I'd like to try.  I'd like to do this again for my Monday
> 3pm PDT office hour, but this time, have a very specific, ordered list
> to tackle.  Here's the list:
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Bug_triage/2007-04-16
>
> This list was an arbitrary listing of the next issues in the queue.  The
> first 10 are above the cut line, and the rest are there to move up
> should there be time.  If no one looks at that list before our meeting,
> then it'll work pretty much like last time.   If you'd like to request
> that an issue you filed get moved up, please request that on the talk
> page.  Those who show up to the bug triage get priority, and we'll be
> more inclined to discuss your issues first.
>
> Over time, we'll probably stop using any of my office hours and my
> in-world cube for this, and start having them in a more suitable area.
> Where that is is tbd; I may not even be the person running it in the
> future (that's my hint to you other Lindens that I wouldn't be offended
> if you "steal" it from me).  It may be that we break up the triage
> meetings by project or component.
>
> Please let us know what you think.
>
> Thanks!
> Rob
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>
>
>


-- 
--Jesse
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070414/fc036c33/attachment.htm