[sldev] Are the voice components redistributable?

[Able Whitman]

No, they're not, apparently. Rob said the following in another thread:

"> I noticed that the license file for the libraries package doesn't
> include the license for vivoxsdk, SLVoice, or SLVoiceAgent. Can we
> distribute these binaries or will open source clients not have voice
> capabilities?

The short answer is "no, you can't redistribute these components".  You
can file this in PJIRA too, but I've already put something in our
internal tracker (SL-50890)  to make sure we put a very clear notice on
these.

Rob"


On 8/7/07, Dale Glass <dale at daleglass.net> wrote:
>
> I've updated the page:
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Third_Party_Libraries#Windows
>
> Does anybody know whether the files listed under Vivox and "Unknown
> Libraries" are redistributable?
>
> I think somebody mentioned Vivox builds on top of open technologies,
> it's possible that not all the files have the same licenses.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070807/78c005ec/attachment.htm