[sldev] [VWR] Vectorization on i386?

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Tue Dec 4 11:24:09 PST 2007


On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:49 -0800, Dzonatas wrote:
> We know that leads to patching blindly. We don't get to see the
> internal branch to see how it actually got applied.  At that point,
> there is no way for us to guarantee any further patches applied to an
> internal branch do work as intended.

So basically no one on the "outside" is ever going to be able to get
large invasive changes merged until LL opens up their SCM. :P
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20071204/58246170/attachment.pgp


More information about the SLDev mailing list