[sldev] The criminalization of open source

[Nikki Claymore]

Dzonatas wrote:
> nikki at cf-estates.com wrote:
>> Quoting Dzonatas <dzonatas at dzonux.net>:
>>
>>> When you quoted me, you left out some bits of my e-mail, like this:
>>
>> I do try to keep replies down to what I'm addressing
>
> By first asking me directly off list and then quoting only part back 
> on list? Ok.
You might want to recompare those messages. I accidentally replied 
directly to you the first time then redirected the message verbatim to 
the list.
>> That section is totally irrelevant to any discussion of whether the 
>> TOS declares the Linden valueless.
>
> Being it still refers to how to use the license, it is very much in 
> discussion. Unless, you are suggesting that when you buy something 
> with Lindens, with or without value, that you don't have to respect 
> the rights of the content creators. =/
I would suggest that the rights of the content creators have nothing to 
do with the form of compensation received whether its USD, EUR, Lindens 
or frozen turkey's.
>>> DMCA and other copyright law can go so far. It is not foolproof --
>>> especially where such law has no jurisdiction.
>>
>> The law lacks jurisdiction over copyright infringement in SL?
> The law of what country?
That would depend on what court the suit is filed in wouldn't? Looks 
like Adam knows more about where filing would be needed than me.