[sldev] The criminalization of open source

[Dzonatas]

nikki at cf-estates.com wrote:
> Quoting Dzonatas <dzonatas at dzonux.net>:
>
>> When you quoted me, you left out some bits of my e-mail, like this:
>
> I do try to keep replies down to what I'm addressing

By first asking me directly off list and then quoting only part back on 
list? Ok.

>
>> "The TOS does not state that the Linden Dollar has value. The TOS does
>> not prevent the Linden Dollar from having value. Who claims there is
>> value?"
>
> I was addressing your clear and repeated claim the TOS states the L$ 
> has no value would this statement be retreating from that claim?
That doesn't answer my question. I answered yours.

> That section is totally irrelevant to any discussion of whether the 
> TOS declares the Linden valueless.

Being it still refers to how to use the license, it is very much in 
discussion. Unless, you are suggesting that when you buy something with 
Lindens, with or without value, that you don't have to respect the 
rights of the content creators. =/


>
>> DMCA and other copyright law can go so far. It is not foolproof --
>> especially where such law has no jurisdiction.
>
> The law lacks jurisdiction over copyright infringement in SL?
The law of what country?

-- 
Power to Change the Void