[sldev] Re: Where we are headed in IPC development (Phoenix)

Argent Stonecutter secret.argent at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 16:14:22 PDT 2007


Looks like it's got a lot in common with Usenet, with duplicated  
message IDs receiving identical responses rather than being dropped.  
I'm not sure about the requirement that the URL and response be  
opaque, do you simply mean that chttp must not modify them? That's  
what the implementation would seem to imply.


More information about the SLDev mailing list