[sldev] Re: Where we are headed in IPC development (Phoenix)

Which Linden rdw at lindenlab.com
Tue Jul 10 16:29:09 PDT 2007


Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> Looks like it's got a lot in common with Usenet, with duplicated message
> IDs receiving identical responses rather than being dropped. I'm not
> sure about the requirement that the URL and response be opaque, do you
> simply mean that chttp must not modify them? That's what the
> implementation would seem to imply.

Yeah, it also means that chttp can't depend on any special structure in
the urls themselves (e.g. assuming that the url contains
"?message_id=ABC" and parsing the ID out).

-RYaN


More information about the SLDev mailing list