[sldev] Re: Where we are headed in IPC development (Phoenix)

[Dzonatas]

Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> Looks like it's got a lot in common with Usenet, with duplicated 
> message IDs receiving identical responses rather than being dropped. 
> I'm not sure about the requirement that the URL and response be 
> opaque, do you simply mean that chttp must not modify them? That's 
> what the implementation would seem to imply.

Hey now, the IHAVE/SENDME protocol of USENET was one of the best eras to 
get a distribution across the world before such concepts as an always-on 
Internet connection.

As for what I have considered of CHTTP, I second the motion for the 
wider proof-of-concept phase!
-- 
Power to Change the Void