[sldev] Patches

[Phoenix]

This patch looks correct, but we are worried about breaking existing  
scripts. Since we have not yet developed conformance tests for lsl,  
people here are gun-shy about changing the grammar or implementation.



On 2007 Mar 1, at 12:07, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:10 -0600, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
>>> Linden Lab would like to acknowledge source code contributions from
>>> the
>>> following residents.   The Second Life resident name is given below,
>>> along with the issue identifier corresponding to the patches we've
>>> received from them.  To see more about these contributions, visit
>>> http://jira.secondlife.com/ , and enter the issue identifier.
>>
>> I assume these are only patches have all been incorporated into the
>> production viewer, then, since I don't see (VWR-68) on the list. Can
>> you say which release of the viewer each of these patches are (or
>> will be) in?
>
> Well considering VWR-68 is still open and unassigned...
>
> It would be nice to have this merged, as this is a well known, long
> standing and obnoxious bug in LSL script parsing.
>
> Could a linden at least acknowledge the patch?
> _______________________________________________
> Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription:
> /index.html

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070301/ac1917f9/PGP.pgp