[sldev] Patches

[Callum Lerwick]

On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:17 -0800, Phoenix wrote:
> This patch looks correct, but we are worried about breaking existing  
> scripts. Since we have not yet developed conformance tests for lsl,  
> people here are gun-shy about changing the grammar or implementation.

Well, isn't that what First Look is for? :) Perhaps once the rendering
improvements are merged into mainline, this patch can be put into the
next First Look, and let people give it a good pounding for a month or
two.

My experience with this parsing bug is, it makes scripts that SHOULD
work not compile, forcing a work-around. (Add a space.) Any currently
working script should continue to work. Any scripts relying on the
current buggy parsing, is... some pretty awful code. Of course, its
inevitable that there's probably some out there *somewhere*...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070302/42867151/attachment.pgp