[sldev] GPLed submissions

[Callum Lerwick]

On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 17:33 -0700, John Hurliman wrote:
> They couldn't do any of this if there was a GPL infection in the viewer code.

Except for the fact that the viewer *IS* GPL. The problem isn't the GPL,
the problem is having copyright ownership over the code so that they can
dual-license and re-license it anyway they like. Which is what they're
enforcing.

Copyright holders get to do whatever they like.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070316/da54735e/attachment-0001.pgp