[sldev] Heads up - we're working on CMake

Mike Monkowski monkowsk at watson.ibm.com
Fri Nov 30 14:00:13 PST 2007


Dzonatas wrote:
> Mike Monkowski wrote:
> 
>>     Given the pain endured making VS2005 project files from VS2003 
>> project files for every source code release, wouldn't it be easier for 
>> us to hack a set of CMakeList files once from your set?  I think it 
>> would be a lot easier to maintain CMakeList files than to maintain MS 
>> project files.
> 
> 
> What pain?
> 
> I spent my personal time to create patches and make it easy to build the 
> source on Windows for either VS2003 or VS2005 without the need for 
> project files. It works. I see no pain.

I was one of the people you directed to the SVN repository.  I just 
didn't know what to do with it. I saw SConstruct files that I didn't 
understand.

When LL updates their VS2003 project files, I could see no easy path to 
update the SConstruct files.

I know nothing about CMake either, but the advantage I see is that it 
should be easy to merge LL changes to internal CMakeList files into open 
source CMakeList files.  And since Bryan says that one set of CMakeList 
files should work for both internal and open source builds, even that 
shouldn't be necessary.

So don't think I'm ungrateful for the SCons work you did.  It's just 
that I'm too dumb to figure it out. :(

Mike



More information about the SLDev mailing list