[sldev] Heads up - we're working on CMake

[Callum Lerwick]

On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 13:50 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> John Hurliman wrote:
> 
> > Wouldn't it have been faster to attach those files to your reply e-mail 
> > instead of writing the previous sentence then?
> 
> When I try to share some useful information, I'm not too pleased to get 
> snarky, unhelpful comebacks like this.

Yes, I'm a bit surprised this thread is getting so much venom. I think
it's just the general frustration with the current segregated
development process bubbling to the surface, that we're all feeling on
the outside.

I for one welcome our new cmake overlords!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20071130/41f5e8e5/attachment.pgp