[sldev] Re: [PROTOCOL] Protocol Documentation

[Callum Lerwick]

On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:42 -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> That is, there are licenses that create a problem for open  
> systems use, and ones that don't. The GPL happens to be one that does.

Can you point to a concrete example of the GPL causing such a problem?

Though as part of the new architecture work, I really would like to see
the low level protocol stuff abstracted into its own library. And that
library could be MIT licensed for all I care. Would that make everyone
happy? (Yeah yeah, libsecondlife is already there... :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20071003/6098d914/attachment.pgp