[sldev] [META] GPL'd APIs (Re: Protocol Documentation)

[Callum Lerwick]

On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 20:38 -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> First, I ALSO said that it was up to Linden Labs to say what was OK  
> or not, not the FSF. I'm just explaining WHY people are leary of the  
> GPL. Because this kind of stuff KEEPS happening. The FSF are the  
> GPL's worst enemies some times.

You're only confusing the issue and adding to the FUD.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20071003/ac599217/attachment.pgp