[sldev] Packaging the viewer for Linux distributions

[Ryan Williams (Which)]

Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> On 12-Oct-2007, at 13:33, Ryan Williams (Which) wrote:
>> Yeah.  Internally we've asserted that the combination of channel name +
>> version is just as unique as the md5, so that might be faster/more
>> convenient as an index.
> 
> If you're going to binary patch it, I suspect you probably need to check
> the hash of the whole thing anyway. :)

Yeah, you're probably right.  Safety First!

-RYaN