[sldev] [LICENSING] Vivox SLVoice.exe documentation

[Dale Glass]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:59:02AM -0700, John Hurliman wrote:
> Speak for yourself, I never entered in to any agreement with Vivox that 
> supersede my rights granted under the 1201(f) exemption of the DMCA. 
> However, it might create problems documenting how the voice protocol 
> works on the wiki if the redistribution language is too strict.
I speak for myself, and I say that I am not going to use, or even touch
any documentation under terms like that, even if they might not have an
effect. If they don't, then they shouldn't be there in the first place.

> 
> On a side note I don't think there is a serious legal problem here. If a 
> company found it more beneficial to sue developers rather then porting 
> their own code it would speak volumes about their competency as software 
> and service provider.

That would still suck for the developer though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070918/1ace41a8/attachment.pgp