[sldev] [ARCH] Architecture Working Group in the wiki

[dirk husemann]

Tao Takashi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just wanted to summarize a bit what I've done in the wiki for this
> project. So it all starts at
>
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Architecture_Working_Group
> <https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Architecture_Working_Group>
>
> From there I created pages which describe the proposed architecture as
> I understood it when Zero was talking about it. Feel free to correct
> me there or add more detail.
>
> Then I also added a Use Case page which already has some use cases and
> scenarios on it. Gigs also added some Strategic Goals which might help
> in finding the scope. My idea for now is though to think outside any
> scope for a while which is the reason for the blue sky scenarios there.
>
> As not everything fits into use case descriptions (after all they
> actually should only explain how the user directly interacts with the
> system and are maybe more useful for the viewer. But for now we migth
> see the components as the user) I also added a brainstorming section
> which is free form:
>
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Brainstorming
>
> I would define the scope later then by collecting which features and
> requirements we want to model. Apparently these will be at least all
> the existing ones plus X. Then we could go in depth with the use cases
> and define protocols between the components.
>
> One first workitem might be to discuss other ways of decomposing based
> on the requirements we come up with. After we then decide to either
> stay with that setup or change it, it will be easier to define use
> cases as the components are fixed then.
>
> Anyway, feel free to edit and hope to meet some of you at Zero's
> office hour :-)
>
> Oh, and does this project need some (temporary) name actually? For me
> it's sometimes hard to say people what I am working on and I come up
> with something like "new SL architecture" etc.
>
> cheers,
>
> Tao
>
> PS: I am also thinking about doing some in-world meetings to maybe
> explain this thing to some more people. There seems to be interest.
> And I think it also needs to get publicized more. After all I think
> this project is rather drastic in the approach used and the thing
> being made and if it's really the start of e new internet then it
> should get more attention IMHO :-)
tao, count me in on the in-world meetings bit :-)

    cheers,
    dirk aka dr scofield

-- 
dr dirk husemann, pervasive computing, ibm zurich research lab
--- hud at zurich.ibm.com --- +41 44 724 8573 --- SL: dr scofield

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/attachments/20070924/209a1e2a/attachment.htm