[sldev] GPL issues....
gareth at litesim.com
Sat Aug 16 14:15:20 PDT 2008
Who said anything about sueing? I wouldn't even have standing to sue,
since I haven't got any patches in the viewer (the reason for this by
the way is in fact the contributor agreement - otherwise i'd be a hell
of a lot more active with viewer development).
I also stated that i'm "not as concerned about" Nicholaz since he's a
decent guy, not "it's fine for him to violate the license because he's
a decent guy". I haven't yet bothered to contact Nicholaz simply
because I doubt he'd really respond in the same arrogant manner Henri
has. Henri's response was literally to state that the viewer isn't
GPLed, but his patches are. If the attitude is that it's fine for him
to claim this, then fair enough - I won't bother. However, let that
meme get spread around and it'll be a ticking timebomb to more serious
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Darien Caldwell
<darien.caldwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know i'm going to get dogpiled for saying this, but wouldn't be the
> first time. :)
> Sit back and think about what you are saying. You want to sue someone,
> because you don't want to have to patch the source yourself. Think
> about the level of ridiculousness in what you are doing. If he wasn't
> distributing his changes, that's one thing. But this, is truely
> something else.
> And the statement that it's okay for Nicholaz to not distribute full
> sources because he is a 'decent guy', but for Henri, it's not, speaks
> to your true intentions.
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
More information about the SLDev